vast.png
Blog_Finance and budget holders - the difference between responsibility and accountability
Finance & Accounting, Budget management, Purchase order management | 2 Min Read

Finance and Budget Holders: The difference between responsibility and accountability

Written by:
Neil Robertson on June 10, 2016

   

In most organisations, budget holders are responsible for the purchasing for their department and making the best use of the available budget, whilst finance teams are both responsible and accountable for capturing and accounting activities for that spend.

Finance use ERP and accounting software to manage the process of capturing the relevant invoices, getting them approved, posting them to the ledgers and getting the supplier paid. Once a month they provide the management reports to the budget holder to update them on where they are against budget.

So what are the tools and information available to the budget holder that would be sufficient to make them accountable for their spend? The answer is almost none because the information they would need is locked up in the finance ERP /accounting software.

The diligent budget holder addresses this problem with multiple spreadsheets that they maintain to track their spend against the available budget. This is a time consuming activity and always needs reconciliation to the management accounts when they arrive.

The diligent budget holder will also be continually asking information from finance about their suppliers such as: how much they are spending, the status of transactions and payments and even for historic information on the price paid for something historically for reference. At least they will still be asking if finance is capable of responding in a timely manner. If not, they will probably have given up some time ago.

If senior finance management want to make budget holders accountable for their spend management two changes are required.

  • The first is to provide the automation software that delivers the budget holders real time information on every supplier, every transaction (current and historic) including current and projected budget availability. It is unreasonable to hold someone accountable for spend, then keep them in the dark on just about every aspect of that responsibility.
  • The second is to recognise that the current manual purchasing processes may address finance’s requirements, but almost all ERP/ Accounting applications are unfit for purpose to address the budget holder’s requirements.

The benefits of purchasing automation can extend far beyond productivity gains. It represents an opportunity to deliver a single seamless paperless process that puts the organisation on the same digital page for every aspect of purchasing.

It should replace the budget holders spreadsheets to help them plan spend more efficiently and provide finance with oversight of that plan spend a far into the future as the plans exist.

Perhaps most important of all, it should enable finance and budget holders to work much more closely together and develop the organisation’s skills in the effective management of budgets and spend.

The result – purchasing automation ensures that everyone is now both responsible and accountable for their purchasing, because the business has provided the tools to make that possible.

   

Powerful tools for better business

Compleat's powerful featureset means that there's a huge number of useful tools under the hood - designed to make business easier, faster and simpler. Speak to one of our sales experts to find out what we can do for your business today.

Learn more