Neil Robertson Jun 9, 2020 11:38:00 AM 8 min read

Finance Firms: Should You Invest In Employee Technology Training?

Updating or introducing new technology can be a significant investment for a company; not just in terms of initial costs & implementation, but also in terms of employee training to get the most out of it & ensuring the investment delivers a positive return.

However, in many cases, this issue of employee technology training is too often viewed as an “add on” (something to be haggled over as an area to reduce costs) or in extreme cases, something to be left out altogether.

There are a number of reasons for this, & the cost is one; businesses could be reluctant to train all their staff on a system or hope that by training a select few, these employees will then train other staff in the long term.

Another reason is a concern that trained staff will eventually leave & take their (paid for by the company) skills with them.

But ultimately, whatever the reason, any company that views employee technology as anything other than an essential part of a digital transformation project is never going to get the full value of their investment.

Unfortunately, it appears that many businesses are taking this route, investing in technology & then relying on employees to “pick it up as they go”. At least this is what 25% of finance workers told us in a recent survey as part of our From cost center to revenue creator: How tech is changing the role of finance report.

With one in four employees saying they are expected to learn how to use solutions without training, how can businesses possibly be getting the most out of their tech investment?

 

Is Tech Being Used To Its Full Potential? 

There is little argument to be made against the idea that technology (when implemented properly & within a strategy) is an enabler in the role of business & finance. So the real issue is establishing whether teams are using the technology to its full potential, & ensuring businesses get the full ROI from their investment.

But with employees left to figure out new technology on their own (with no guidance or basic technology training), it is reasonable to assume that they – & their teams – are not getting the most out of whatever technology their company decides to adopt.

If technology isn’t being used to its full potential – & possibly not solving the problems it is meant to – it is also reasonable to argue that “technology investment” should not be limited to just software & hardware, but extended to technology training for employees. These areas should always fall under this umbrella as part of any investment strategy.

This is particularly true given that a Gartner report in 2018 highlighted the need for employees to show “extreme digital dexterity” if they are to successfully navigate the technology-driven, digital-first workplaces of the future.

 

Helping Or Hindering Productivity? 

Productivity among the UK’s workforce has been in decline for years. In fact, figures from the Office for National Statistics have estimated that workers have cost themselves as much as $7K+  of income due to a lack of productivity.

Technology has become one of the key drivers when it comes to improving productivity (at least according to the marketing slogans). With technology like automation taking over repetitive tasks – & performing them quicker than humans – the theory is that people can get on with more important, value-adding tasks like strategy.

But if teams aren’t, or can’t, get the most out of the technology on offer, the productivity gains will be lost.

Investing in people through technology training is, therefore, just as much an important part of technology investment as buying new software & hardware – if not more so. Formal education means you’ll get better ROI from new tech, & help employees meet their own aspirations & build their own skill sets.

 

Should Vendors Be Providing The Training? 

However, while our research has put the lack of technology training at the feet of businesses (with employees expecting their company to provide training on new software), is that really where the responsibility of training really lies?

Or should the technology vendors themselves be offering training?

If you look to the United States, tech vendors are ahead of the game when it comes to formalized technology training, recognized qualifications & providing users with resources that allow them to improve their knowledge, earn qualifications &  increase their skills.

HubSpot, for instance, includes an array of certifications within its platform for users to learn more about the technology, as well as gain a wider understanding of the marketing, sales & service industry.

So should financial technology vendors be expected to offer the same to help teams get to grips with the software they provide?

 

Think Of Employee Technology Training As An Investment, Not A Cost

Ultimately, you have to decide whether you want to get full value out of your investment in new technology. Left to their own devices, employees will inevitably learn enough of the technology or software on their own to be able to use it – but will never be able to use it fully.

Similarly, only investing in technology training for some staff means you are limiting the talent pool in your business – & then running the risk of trained workers leaving & taking their knowledge with them. 

Investing in your employees’ technology training, therefore, has to be implemented directly into any digital transformation project you are planning. It’s not a cost, it’s an investment in future savings & efficiency.

 

Want to learn more about how technology is changing the role of finance, enabling it to fill a strategic as well as a functional role? Download our report by clicking below.

New call-to-action

avatar

Neil Robertson

Neil has a 39-year track record of building successful direct and channel global software businesses predominately in the financial software market place. Neil Robertson is Executive Chairman of Compleat Software. A 39-year veteran of the financial software marketplace, Neil has a long track record of building disruptive start-ups into successful businesses, including his time as CEO EMEA of Great Plains where he built the business outside of the USA from 1995 - 2001. Compleat is no exception and perhaps the most disruptive of them all.